This epistle is late because I was in Japan, where I was fortunate enough to spend time with fellow members Hamakko and his yet-to-be-named-but-definitely-in-the-club girlfriend. Enjoying a superb wine tasting most every night for my duration, one particular evening’s sampling featured a pair of Bordeaux in an ongoing battle we called the Left Bank/Right Bank war. Hamakko is particularly fond of Left Bank Bordeaux, while I (the Bad Man) find the lushness of Merlot most satisfying, often found more predominantly in the Right Bank (although note that great Left Bankers – like one of my all-time favs Château Pichon Comtesse de Lalande, Grand Cru Classé Pauillac – do often have 50% Merlot, so I don’t consider those supporting what I have against Left Bank Bordeaux).
This evening’s line up consisted of:
2006 Seigneurs D’Aiguilhe Comtes Von Neipperg Côtes de Castillon, 13.5% abv, 2,500 ¥ (approx. $28 USD)
2005 Chateau Moulinat Haut-Médoc, 13.5% abv, 3,150 ¥ (approx. $35 USD)
60% Cab Sauv, 35% Merlot, 5% Cab Franc
(note that this is not the Pomerol which appears mostly in my searching on the web; sadly I can’t locate much about this particular wine)
As the Left Bank contender won my favour on this occasion, overall I found in my fortnight’s stay that in all other pairings (there were three formally) I declared the Right Bank the superior. But that’s a separate blog. Note however for completists that the above D’Aiguilhe is not the same as the Château D’Aiguilhe featured within these same pages on a previous WOTM – this Seigneurs D’Aiguilhe from what I understand – and the price point bears witness – is their second label. But enough about Right Bank – let’s talk about this Haut-Médoc already!
Okay, I have to start with the basics. Usually we look at colour just to look at colour; perhaps to see the tawny tinge around the rim of a 20 year old claret, perhaps to swirl and see the inky black stains of what promises to be a monstrous Petite Sirah. But in this instance I was blown away by this Haut-Médoc’s fabulous colour – it was precisely what I think a beautiful Bordeaux blend’s coloration should imbue – inky dark with a blood-scarlet rim – zero fade. Hamakko just installed a wonderfully aesthetically pleasing kitchen overhead lamp in his home, so all the wines we sampled showed their true colours so to speak, but this girl was spot on!
Once past the awesome visual appeal, I settled in to examine the nose. Here we have a stunning portrayal on everything that is the Bordeaux nose – cassis, tar, musk, black currant, chocolate – plus some fried egg and horse manure thrown in for good measure. And this baby was not closed – the smells leapt from the glass, hurling themselves into your olfactory centre.
Not to be outdone, the mouthfeel took names. Gnarly tannins, intense dark fruit flavours, expansive presence on the palate; and showing great promise for aging as there was a little disconnect between the fruit and the structure – I believe they’ll tie together over time.
Bad Man: 91
As I alluded above, since this Haut-Médoc is only 60% Cabernet Sauvignon I don’t think it’s a fair contender for this whole LB/RB war, as I would expect at least 75% CS to give the Cab it’s justice and in so doing exhibit its weakness, but I still enjoy saying that I’ll take the defeat in this battle if I get to taste something this remarkable.
10/10/2009 at 3:25 pm Permalink
Sounds like a great WOTM. Many thanks to our “Eastern” chapter for hosting this tasting. I love the description of the nose (especially the touch of fried egg) and wish we in the Bay Area had such great access to Old World Bordeaux at modest prices. Insert envy here.
On a side note, it was so much fun looking at the video footage of BadMan’s visit and finally being able to put faces with names. And may I say how impressed I was with your wine notebooks. Very cool indeed! No campaigning is necessary- all we need is one more club name as you’re both charter members in good standing.
All hail!
tally-ho
11/10/2009 at 9:33 am Permalink
Hosting the Bad Man here at the Eastern chapter was a blast for sure!
Bad Man generously provided many wines from near and far and we enjoyed the HELL out of the nightly tastings! Much was drank, much was learned, fists flew, tears fell, stemware collided, villages pillaged, countries fell, and fun was had by all!
One theme was certainly the LB/RB war – and it provided a little-needed-excuse to buy and consume much Bordeaux! “Left Bank vs. Right Bank” or “Cab Sauv. vs. Merlot” – these are the details often glossed over in a drunken throw-down of the proverbial glove… But as Bad Man says, all is good in…a wine tasting war!
And as the dust settled, this Chateau Moulinat was certainly left standing as an outstanding Bordeaux no matter which side of the fence you stand!
Bad Man’s review covered most of what I thought as well – though I did detect a bit of green veggies (which *I* actually enjoy) upon tasting, as well as some hairspray (which I don’t enjoy!). Also I might add, the finish was soft and extended – impressive. My final score was an 87 – which handily beat out the 81 given to its contender, the Chateau d’Aiguilhe…
Thanks to Tally-Ho for her always-warm welcome – will definitely be hanging out here more often! We’ll get a name for Hamakko GF and party on with you good people for as long as you’ll have us!
12/10/2009 at 2:53 pm Permalink
Hamakko,
Wit, taste, intelligence and worthy opponents are always welcome in our humble ranks and you and GF have all of the above in spades.
I look forward to many postings from you and sharing our adventures in the eternal quest for the best products of the grapes.
Cheers!
tally